Dubai Medical University · Quality Assurance & Institutional Effectiveness
C. Education Program
C.7 — AI Usage Policy
Document Control Information
- Policy Code
- C.7
- Standard
- C. Education Program
- Status
- published
- Version
- 5
- Process Owner
- Assoiate Dean Academic Affairs(ADAA)
- Prepared By
- ADAA
- Reviewed By
- Academic Council
- BOT Approval
- approved
- First Issue Date
- 06 Nov 2024
- Last Review Date
- 15 Oct 2026
- Relevant To
- DMU Faculty,Students
- Used With
- —
Modification History
| Version | Date | Update Information | Author/ Reviewer |
| V 1.0 | Nov 2024 | New policy implemented | AI and Smart Education Unit |
| V1.1 | June 2026 | · Added guidance on acceptable
student use of AI. · Introduced assessment categories
(AI prohibited, permitted, or integrated). · Added an AI use disclosure
requirement. · Clarified limitations on the use
of AI detection tools in misconduct investigations. · Strengthened confidentiality and
data protection requirements. | AI and Smart Education Unit & QAIE |
Purpose and Scope
Purpose:Scope:
This policy applies to all faculty, students, researchers, and staff at DMU who engage with the following AI tools and Generative AI technologies, including but not limited to:
- AI-powered educational platforms and personalized learning systems.
- AI-driven research tools used for data analysis, simulations, and predictive modeling.
- Generative AI tools like ChatGPT for creating content, assignments, and research projects.
- AI tools used in clinical simulations, patient care scenarios, and decision-making processes.
Abbreviations and Definitions
• AI (Artificial Intelligence): Computer systems capable of performing tasks that typically require
human intelligence, such as reasoning, learning, and decision-making.
• Generative AI: AI systems capable of producing new text, images, audio, code, or
other content in response to a prompt.
• Large Language Model (LLM): A type of Generative AI trained on large volumes of text to
understand and generate human-like language.
• Human Oversight: The requirement that a qualified person reviews, verifies, and
takes responsibility for AI-assisted outputs before they are relied upon.
• AI Hallucination: Content generated by an AI system that is factually incorrect,
fabricated, or unsupported by evidence, but presented as if accurate.
• Algorithmic Bias: Systematic errors or unfair outcomes produced by an AI system that
disadvantage particular individuals or groups.
• AI Incident: Any event in which an AI tool causes, or could reasonably cause,
harm, a data breach, a safety risk, or a significant policy violation.
• Sensitive Data: Patient identifiers, clinical records, student records, staff
records, unpublished research data, examination materials, or other
confidential institutional information.
• AI System Inventory: An institutional register listing all AI tools approved for use,
their purpose, and their risk classification.
• Agentic AI: AI systems capable of autonomously carrying out multi-step tasks or
actions on a user's behalf with limited direct human input.
Policy Statement
All users of AI tools and Generative AI technologies must:
- Adhere to ethical guidelines: Ensure the responsible and ethical use of AI in accordance with institutional and UAE regulations.
- Maintain academic integrity: Avoid using AI tools to engage in plagiarism, academic dishonesty, or other unauthorized practices.
- Ensure accuracy: Verify and cross-check outputs from AI systems to ensure reliability and credibility.
- Protect data privacy: Follow data protection protocols when using AI systems that involve sensitive information, particularly in clinical and research contexts.
- Promote inclusivity: Utilize AI tools in a way that fosters equitable access and avoids biases or discrimination.
- Report misuse: Notify relevant authorities if AI tools are used inappropriately or in violation of this policy
Policy Statement — Continued
DMU’s AI usage policy is built upon the following ethical principles:
·
Transparency: All AI use in academic work
must be disclosed, and students/faculty must clearly indicate when AI tools
have been utilized in research, assignments, clinical simulations, or content creation.
·
Accountability: Human oversight is essential
for all AI-driven decisions. AI tools must complement, not replace, human
judgment in both educational and clinical contexts. Faculty members are responsible for verifying the outputs of
AI tools used in assessments and simulations.
·
Fairness and Non-discrimination: AI
tools must be regularly audited to ensure they do not introduce or perpetuate
biases. This applies to AI systems used in student assessments, research, and
clinical decision-making.
·
Data Privacy and Security: The use of AI tools must
adhere to UAE’s Federal Law No. 2 of 2019, GDPR, and HIPAA to protect sensitive
patient and academic data. AI systems must not compromise patient
confidentiality or expose private information.
·
Beneficence and Non-maleficence: AI
tools must enhance educational outcomes and research while ensuring that no
harm is caused through misinformation, bias, or over-reliance on AI.
·
Human
Oversight: A
qualified human must remain responsible for, and able to override, any decision
informed by AI.
·
Integrity:
AI
must be used honestly and disclosed appropriately in all academic, research,
and clinical work.
·
Equity:
AI
tools and their benefits must be made accessible to all students, faculty, and
staff regardless of background or ability.
·
Verification:
All
AI-generated outputs must be checked against reliable sources before being used
or relied upon.
·
Safety:
AI
tools must not be used in ways that could endanger patients, students, staff,
or the integrity of the institution.
Procedures & Guidelines
Educational Content Creation: Faculty members may utilize AI
tools to enhance course materials, lectures,
and case studies. However:
•AI-generated content must be reviewed for accuracy and academic rigor.
•AI should supplement, not replace, critical
academic content developed
by faculty.
1.
Faculty
Responsibilities (proposed addition): Faculty may use AI tools to support the
development of learning outcomes, rubrics, quizzes, case scenarios, curriculum
mapping, feedback drafting, reports, and meeting minutes.
Faculty must not:
• Allow AI to mark or
grade student work independently, without faculty review.
• Allow AI outputs to
determine student progression or academic standing.
• Upload confidential
assessments, question banks, or student records into public AI tools.
2.
Student Use of
Generative AI (e.g., ChatGPT and Similar Tools): Students are permitted to use
Generative AI tools for research, content generation, and studying under the
following conditions:
·
AI-generated content must be clearly cited in all assignments and projects.
·
Students must disclose their use of AI in submitted work to maintain academic integrity.
·
Misuse of AI (e.g.,
submitting AI-generated essays, reflections without acknowledgment) will be
treated as academic misconduct, with penalties in accordance with DMU’s
academic policies.
·
Students may use AI
tools for concept clarification, generating practice questions, brainstorming
ideas, improving grammar and language, summarizing personal notes, creating
study plans, and supporting literature searches where permitted. Students
remain responsible for the accuracy, originality, and integrity of all
submitted work.
3. Examinations and Assessments:
AI
use in assessments shall be determined by the course instructor and clearly
stated in the course syllabus or assessment instructions.
·
Category A – AI
Prohibited: No AI use is permitted except spelling,
grammar, or accessibility tools. This category applies by default to
examinations, OSCEs, viva examinations, in-class tests, and clinical competency
assessments.
·
Category B – AI
Permitted with Declaration: AI may be used for specified purposes,
provided the student declares how AI was used.
·
Category C – AI
Integrated: AI use forms part of the assessment task, and students are required
to demonstrate critical evaluation and verification of AI-generated outputs.
AI Declaration:
Where AI is used in assignments,
projects, reports, theses, dissertations, or scholarly work, users should
include the following declaration:
"I used [AI Tool Name] for
[purpose]. I reviewed, verified, and take full responsibility for the final
submitted work."
Assessment Redesign (proposed addition): Where feasible,
assessment design should evolve to reduce reliance on AI-detection tools alone
by increasing the use of assessment formats that are harder to complete solely
with AI, such as viva voce examinations, OSCEs, portfolios, oral defence,
reflective writing, and other authentic, performance-based assessment.
Procedures & Guidelines — Continued
Use of AI in Research
AI-Assisted Research
·
Researchers are
encouraged to use AI tools for tasks such as data analysis, predictive
modelling, and simulations.
·
All AI tools and methodologies employed must be disclosed in research publications and reports.
Peer Review (proposed addition): Faculty and reviewers
must not upload manuscripts, grant applications, or confidential reviewer
reports into public AI tools.
AI Contributions
·
Research publications must acknowledge the role of AI tools, including their specific contributions.
·
Limitations of the AI tools should be transparently stated to avoid over-reliance on AI-generated data.
Research Integrity and Authorship (proposed addition):
·
AI tools cannot be listed as an author
on any publication.
·
AI must not be used to fabricate data,
references, citations, or research participants.
·
AI cannot replace scientific or
scholarly judgement in the design, analysis, or interpretation of research.
Intellectual Property (proposed addition): Ownership and
copyright of AI-assisted institutional material must be clarified in accordance
with DMU policy and applicable UAE law before publication or distribution.
AI in Clinical Simulations
Clinical Education
·
AI-generated
simulations can be used to enhance student training by providing real-world
decision-making scenarios.
·
Faculty members must
review all AI-generated clinical scenarios for accuracy and alignment with
real-world medical practices.
Explicit Clinical AI Limitations (proposed addition): AI must not be used
to diagnose patients, prescribe treatment, or replace clinical judgement.
AI-generated clinical content is for training and educational purposes only and
must be verified by a qualified clinician.
AI-Generated Multimedia (proposed addition): The use of deepfakes,
AI-generated images, or manipulated clinical images is prohibited except where
explicitly approved for educational simulation purposes and clearly labelled as
AI-generated.
Patient Safety Simulations
AI
tools used in patient care simulations must be carefully monitored to ensure
they do not generate harmful outcomes.
AI Governance
Dubai
Medical University (DMU) has established an AI and Smart Education Unit to
oversee the ethical and responsible use of AI tools across the institution.
This unit collaborates with representatives as advisory members from the
Academic Affairs Departments and Program heads of all colleges to ensure robust
governance of AI systems and tools.
AI Governance Committee (proposed addition): DMU should establish
an AI Governance Committee, with representation from Academic Affairs,
Research, QAIE, IT, Legal, IRB, Faculty Development, Assessment, and Students,
to provide broader institutional oversight of AI adoption and risk.
AI System Inventory (proposed addition): DMU should maintain
an institutional register of approved AI tools, documenting their purpose,
data-handling practices, and risk classification.
Approved AI Tools (proposed addition): Only institutionally
approved AI tools should be used for institutional business, including
teaching, assessment, research, and administrative work.
AI Procurement (proposed addition): Before purchasing or
adopting a new AI system, DMU should conduct a security review, legal review,
and vendor assessment.
Key responsibilities of the AI and Smart Education Unit include:
· Policy
Development: Developing and updating AI policies to align with emerging
technological advancements and ethical standards.
· Usage Monitoring:
Supervising the application of AI tools by faculty, students, and researchers
to ensure compliance with institutional policies and ethical principles.
· Ethical
Oversight: Conducting regular evaluations to identify and address biases,
inaccuracies, or ethical concerns in AI systems.
· Training and
Support: Offering guidance and training to faculty and students for the
responsible and effective use of AI in education, research, and clinical
practice.
AI Literacy and Training (proposed addition): DMU should provide
mandatory AI literacy training for students, faculty, and researchers, covering
effective and responsible prompting, ethics, AI hallucinations, algorithmic
bias, and confidentiality.
Monitoring and Audits
To ensure the ethical and effective
use of AI, the AI and Smart Education Unit will implement
the following measures:
Annual AI Reviews
Conduct
comprehensive yearly evaluations of AI tools used in educational, research, and
clinical settings to maintain alignment with ethical standards and
institutional goals.
Bias Testing:
·
Regularly test AI systems, particularly those used in
student assessments, clinical simulations, and research, to detect and mitigate
biases.
·
AI-detection tools may be used to support academic
integrity investigations; however, AI-detection results shall not be used as
the sole basis for determining academic misconduct and must be considered
alongside other evidence.
Student Wellbeing (proposed addition): Students must not be
penalized solely on the basis of an AI-detection tool result where that result
produces a false positive; findings must always be corroborated with other
evidence.
Data Privacy and Security: DMU will enforce strict data
protection protocols to ensure compliance with GDPR, HIPAA, and UAE Federal Law
No. 2 of 2019. Users must not upload patient identifiers, clinical records,
student records, staff records, unpublished research data, examination
materials, or confidential institutional documents into public AI platforms
unless specifically approved by the University.
Measures include:
•Data encryption
to protect sensitive
information.
•Controlled access to AI systems.
•Regular security
reviews to prevent breaches and unauthorized use.
Additional Data Protection Requirements (proposed
addition)
• Cross-border data
transfer involving AI tools must comply with UAE data protection requirements
and be reviewed before use.
• Vendors providing
AI systems remain responsible for the security and appropriate handling of any
institutional data processed by their tools.
• Data residency
requirements must be confirmed for any AI system that stores or processes DMU
data.
• AI procurement
decisions must include a data protection assessment.
• Only vendors
approved through DMU's procurement and legal review process may be used for AI
systems handling institutional data.
Violations and Enforcement
Academic Misconduct: Misuse of AI tools, including
Generative AI systems like ChatGPT, that compromises academic integrity will be
treated as academic misconduct, with penalties as outlined in DMU’s academic
policy.
Research Misconduct: Researchers who fail to disclose the
use of AI tools or misuse AI in their projects will face disciplinary actions
according to DMU’s research integrity guidelines.
Examples of AI- Related Academic Misconduct
The following may constitute academic misconduct:
·
Submitting AI-generated work without disclosure where
required.
·
Using AI in examinations or assessments where prohibited.
·
Fabricating references, citations, clinical cases,
patient information, or research data using AI.
·
Uploading another person's work into an AI system without
permission.
·
Using AI to impersonate another individual.
·
Using AI to conceal plagiarism.
Progressive Discipline Framework (proposed addition): To support consistent
enforcement, violations should be classified using a graded discipline matrix:
• Minor violations (e.g., undisclosed use of AI for
low-stakes tasks): verbal or written warning and educational follow-up.
• Moderate violations (e.g., unauthorized AI use in an
assessment): formal academic misconduct proceedings and grade penalties as
appropriate.
• Major violations (e.g., fabrication of data or
impersonation using AI): referral to the relevant disciplinary committee, with
potential suspension or dismissal.
• Research misconduct involving AI: handled under DMU's
research integrity procedures, which may include retraction and reporting to
funders or journals.
• Data breaches involving AI tools: immediate escalation to
IT/Legal and applicable regulatory notification.
Responsibilities for Application
- Academic affairs department of respective colleges
- AI and Smart Education Unit